Re: [Boost-users] What's happened to Ryppl?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] What's happened to Ryppl?
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-01-25 12:06:52

At Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:24:01 +0000,
Mateusz Loskot wrote:
> 
> On 25/01/11 05:05, Eric Niebler wrote:
> > On 1/25/2011 11:49 AM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
> >> On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 11:36 AM, John Wiegley<johnw_at_[hidden]>  wrote:
> >>> OK, branchification is working!  All that's left is submodulization as part of
> >>> the same run.
> > <snip>
> >>
> >> Coolness! :D So now I think it's a matter of convincing the other
> >> peeps that moving from Subversion to Git is actually a worthwhile
> >> effort. ;)
> >
> > A lot of work remains ---
> 
> Regarding one of bit still under construction, it is sat-solver
> 
> https://github.com/mloskot/sat-solver
> 
> and if it's still wanted, I am going to continue porting it to Visual
> C++ in ~2 weeks. If anyone would like to join the effort, please do!

Dude, you rock!!  I'm so glad to hear that you're intending to do
that.  I will be glad to work with you on it.

Now we have one person/organization *other than me* taking primary
responsibility for each major part of the project:

1. Modularization - John W

2. CMake support - Kitware/Marcus Hanwell (note: one of Kitware's
   clients is actually paying for their work on this)

3. Metadata and dependency resolution - Mateusz Loskot

which leaves me free to do:

4. Automated testing

5. Project coordination

If anyone wants to take #4 off my hands that'd be awesome :-)

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com