Re: [Boost-users] Issues with boost::process from the sandbox and the boost::process::child semantics

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Issues with boost::process from the sandbox and the boost::process::child semantics
From: Jan Kundrát (jkt_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-03-28 20:58:12

On 03/28/11 19:37, Nat Linden wrote:
> It seems to me that you're asking for the 'child' class to store a
> flag: is this a real instance or a placeholder instance? Then every
> access to that object must check the flag.

Hi Nat and others,
based on your arguments, it seems that I was wrong in my evaluation.
Thank you for clarifying the design choices, I now realize that it
indeed makes sense.

Cheers,
Jan

-- 
Trojita, a fast e-mail client -- http://trojita.flaska.net/