Re: [Boost-users] [Lambda] Handling Bind/Lambda name clashes.

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Lambda] Handling Bind/Lambda name clashes.
From: Dave Abrahams (dave_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-06 12:17:09

Please ignore my incoherent babbling.  Need sleep...

On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Dave Abrahams <dave_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Robert Jones wrote:
>>>
>>> > On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Peter Dimov <pdimov_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >   using boost::lambda::bind;
>>> >
>>> > should be a better choice.
>>>
>>> Hello Peter
>>>
>>> Yes, that was my first thought too. But this code still has ambiguity
>>> issues.
>>
>> Yes, you're right, it has. Since boost::function is in namespace boost, the
>> compiler still finds boost::bind via argument-dependent lookup. I'm afraid
>> that you'll have to qualify the ambiguous bind:
>>
>> namespace ll = boost::lambda;
>> ll::bind( my_sum, ... );
>>
>
> I may have forgotten the real truth, but at one point I thought I knew
> that the compiler would do ADL on using-declarations, but not on names
> brought in via using-directive.
>
> --
> Dave Abrahams
> BoostPro Computing
> http://www.boostpro.com
>

-- 
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com