|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost-users][parameter] ArgumentPack Documentation Best Practices
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-11 07:49:47
> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-users-
> bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Christoph Heindl
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 12:12 PM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: [Boost-users] [boost-users][parameter] ArgumentPack Documentation
> Best Practices
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder if anyone could share his best practices as far as documenting
> Boost.Parameter enabled constructors is concerned.
> I'm currently doing something along the lines of
>
> /** Construct from named parameters and use defaults where parameters are
> empty
> *
> *
> * \tparam Opts ArgumentPack of options. The following options are
supported
> * - \a min_group_size minimum number of supporting correspondences to
form
> a group.
> * - \a ntrials number of times to form basis from two randomly selected
> correspondences.
> * - \a bin_size_pos quantization size for transformed point coordinates.
> * - \a bin_size_orientation quantization in radians for surface
orientation
> angles.
> *
> */
> template<class Opts>
> group_geo_hash(const Opts &opts)
> {
> this->init(
> opts[Keywords::_min_group_size | 10],
> opts[Keywords::_bin_size_pos | LibFundament::rasFloat(10)],
> opts[Keywords::_orientation_rad | LibFundament::rasFloat(0.2)],
> opts[Keywords::_ntrials | 0]);
> }
> }
>
> which is sub-optimal, because default values for options and option types
are
> missing. Doxygen can deduce types for regular parameters as well as
default
> values. Ideally this should work for boost.parameters as well :) Even
better,
> Doxygen could warn about undocumented parameters.
I've used Doxygen tags WARN_IF_UNDOCMENTED and WARN_IF_DOC ERROR, and
WARN_NO_PARAMDOC
both in my doxyfile and in jamfiles - all =YES, sending the output to a
named WARN_FILE = Boost_options_warnings.txt.
This gives you a list of missing C++ Doxygen comments doc items if you are
using Doxywizard (recommended at first because it is *much* quicker than
running Quickbook toolchain).
If the warnings file is empty, it is worth running the full docs :-)
HTH - though I'm not sure it solves your real problem.
Paul
--- Paul A. Bristow, Prizet Farmhouse, Kendal LA8 8AB UK +44 1539 561830 07714330204 pbristow_at_[hidden]
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net