Re: [Boost-users] [boost-users][parameter] ArgumentPack Documentation Best Practices

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost-users][parameter] ArgumentPack Documentation Best Practices
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-11 09:48:13

> -----Original Message-----
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] [mailto:boost-users-
> bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Christoph Heindl
> Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:11 PM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost-users][parameter] ArgumentPack
> Documentation Best Practices
> 
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
> wrote:
> >
> > I've used Doxygen tags WARN_IF_UNDOCMENTED and  WARN_IF_DOC
> ERROR, and
> > WARN_NO_PARAMDOC both in my doxyfile and in jamfiles - all =YES,
> > sending the output to a named WARN_FILE = Boost_options_warnings.txt.
> 
> thanks for your feedback, but I doubt that it solves my problem, since my
> undocumented parameters are actually boost.parameter keywords nested
inside
> an argument pack structure (see my initial posting).

I feared not ;-)

Paul