Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [optional] Could (& should) optional be more space efficient?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-11 15:40:16

On 11 April 2011 13:19, David Blaikie <dblaikie_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> From my initial look through boost::optional's implementation, it seems as
> though it's doing nothing to optimize its space usage in some trivial cases.

This topic came up back in October. Check out the discussion at <>

 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at