Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [optional] Could (& should) optional be more space efficient?
From: Nevin Liber (nevin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-11 15:40:16

Next message: Mostafa: "[Boost-users] [function] How to get boost::function parameters, return type."
Previous message: rajiv82: "[Boost-users] Seeking to particular array element while deserializing"
In reply to: David Blaikie: "[Boost-users] [optional] Could (& should) optional be more space efficient?"

On 11 April 2011 13:19, David Blaikie <dblaikie_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> From my initial look through boost::optional's implementation, it seems as
> though it's doing nothing to optimize its space usage in some trivial cases.
>

This topic came up back in October. Check out the discussion at <
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.boost.devel/209172>

-- 
 Nevin ":-)" Liber  <mailto:nevin_at_[hidden]>  (847) 691-1404

text/html attachment: attachment

Next message: Mostafa: "[Boost-users] [function] How to get boost::function parameters, return type."
Previous message: rajiv82: "[Boost-users] Seeking to particular array element while deserializing"
In reply to: David Blaikie: "[Boost-users] [optional] Could (& should) optional be more space efficient?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net