Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] v2 to v3 transition of extension mechanism
From: alfC (alfredo.correa_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-04-12 04:05:43

On Apr 11, 11:47 pm, Thomas Heller <thom.hel..._at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Stay tuned ... :)

Thank you, I'll wait for the good stuff.

By the way, since I was implementing my own I have been thinking about
where to put these functions. They are strictly implemented with
functions in std::,
so, does it makes sense to make parallel namespaces?
like "boost::phoenix::std::cos"
is it a good idea?, or it creates other problems related to parallel

What about leaving the namespace (e.g. std) out of the implementation
of cos_impl to allow for other versions (e.g. from other libraries) of
eager "cos" to be called, perhaps from context?


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at