Re: [Boost-users] Graph Isomorphism

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Graph Isomorphism
From: Evan Driscoll (driscoll_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-06-23 21:39:55

On 06/23/2011 08:37 PM, Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
> They are not isomorphic as directed graphs: the first component in g1 is
> 0->1, 1->2, 0->2 (acyclic), while the first component in g2 is 9->10,
> 10->11, 11->9 (a cycle). The other components are isomorphic in the way
> that you show.

Oh, duh. Too careless.

Thanks,
Evan