Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] A forward iterator need not be default-constructible
From: Brian Allison (brian.w.allison_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-09-30 13:25:43

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 1:15 PM, Kerry, Richard <richard.kerry_at_[hidden]>wrote:

>
> I read that as a comment about a hypothetical perfect compiler.
>
> One that completely complied with The Standard, and had perfect
> optimization.
>
>
> Such a compiler would nevertheless be allowed to fiddle with the iterator
> and be compliant.
> While providing an iterator that could not be compared to itself (not
> releiably).
>

Yes - that's what I intended.