Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with stlport?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Building boost with stlport?
From: Robert Dailey (rcdailey_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-10 15:06:41

Can someone PLEASE help me out here? I'm getting no responses.

If there are proper instructions for building for STLport out there
somewhere, with explicit step by step instructions, please let me know as
that would be very helpful to have.

---------
Robert Dailey

On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Anyone?
>
> ---------
> Robert Dailey
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> So I did some investigation on this and I found out the following:
>>
>> user-config.jam looks like:
>>
>> using msvc : 7.1 ;
>> using stlport : 5.1 :
>> C:/Code/work/rdailey-t510/depot/dev/gfe-dev/server/external/stlport/WINNT5.0_OPT.OBJ/stlport
>> :
>> C:/Code/work/rdailey-t510/depot/dev/gfe-dev/server/external/stlport/WINNT5.0_OPT.OBJ/lib
>> ;
>>
>> And the command I'm using to build boost is:
>>
>> b2 toolset=msvc link=shared threading=multi stdlib=stlport-5.1
>> --build-type=complete stage
>>
>> However during the build process, when the DLL files are being linked,
>> they fail with unresolved externals from STLport. My STLport library is
>> named like so: stlport.5.1.lib
>>
>> Anyone know why this is failing?
>>
>> ---------
>> Robert Dailey
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Robert Dailey <rcdailey_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I was searching around Google for this but I wasn't able to find any
>>> documentation. Is there a way to reliably build the latest version of Boost
>>> using STLport on Windows instead of letting boost use Microsoft's STL
>>> implementation?
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> ---------
>>> Robert Dailey
>>>
>>
>>
>