Re: [Boost-users] [thread]N of args for thread::thread with args

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [thread]N of args for thread::thread with args
From: Marcello Puligheddu (marcello.puligheddu_at_[hidden])
Date: 2011-10-19 16:48:38

Thanks for the sugg.
My question was about that contradiction .

2011/10/19 Leo Carreon <lcarreon_at_[hidden]>

>   Hi Marcello,
>
> If you have a lot of arguments to pass, it is better to pass a structure
> containing all the arguments you want to pass instead of passing them
> individually.
>
> Regards,
> Leo
>
>
>  *From:* Marcello Puligheddu <marcello.puligheddu_at_[hidden]>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 20, 2011 7:16 AM
> *To:* Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> *Subject:* [Boost-users] [thread]N of args for thread::thread with args
>
> In
> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/thread/thread_management.html
>
>
> Thread Constructor with arguments<http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/thread/thread_management.html#thread.thread_management.thread.multiple_argument_constructor>
>  [...]
> Note:
>
> Currently up to nine additional arguments a1 to a9 can be specified in
> addition to the function f.
>   But in
> Launching threads<http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/thread/thread_management.html#thread.thread_management.launching_threads>is
> clearly stated
>
> "There is an unspecified limit on the number of additional arguments that
> can be passed."
> --
> marcello puligheddu
> Cagliari ,Sardegna, Italia
> [phone]
>
>  ------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>

-- 
marcello puligheddu
Cagliari ,Sardegna, Italia
[phone]