Re: [Boost-users] [range] signature discrepancy between equal_range and upper_bound

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [range] signature discrepancy between equal_range and upper_bound
From: giecrilj_at_[hidden]
Date: 2011-12-06 14:17:15

>
>         Re: signature discrepancy between equal_range and upper_bound
>
>   From: Nat Linden <nat_at_[hidden]>
>   Reply to: boost-users_at_[hidden]
>   Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:58:18 -0500
>   Newsgroups:
>          gmane.comp.lib.boost.user
>   Followup to: newsgroup
>   References:
>          <jbkr2p$hi$1_at_[hidden]>
>On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:34 AM,  <giecrilj_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
>> The algorithm equal_range takes the Value by constant reference
>> while the algorithm upper_bound takes Value by value.
>> Why is that? =A0(Note that standard algorithms take a constant reference.)
>
>Sorry to be obtuse, but... are you talking about a Boost library? If
>so, which one?

<URL: file:///usr/share/doc/packages/boost-1.44.0/libs/range/doc/html/range/reference/algorithms/non_mutating/upper_bound.html >