|
Boost Users :
|
- Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[Boost-users] [C++ Now! 2012] Reminder: Call for Submissions, deadline is January 10th, 2012"
- Previous message: sumanth krishna: "[Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- In reply to: sumanth krishna: "[Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- Next in thread: sumanth krishna: "Re: [Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- Reply: sumanth krishna: "Re: [Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
sumanth krishna wrote:
> #8 0x0000000120068b64 in C::~C (this=0x1200a8e70, __in_chrg=<value
> optimized out>)
Is it possible for a thread to still be calling c->getList when ~C is
executed?
Based on your (pseudo)code, a number of temporary std::list<shared_ptr<A>>
instances are created and destroyed without a problem before C's member, so
list destruction on its own seems to work fine.
- Next message: Hartmut Kaiser: "[Boost-users] [C++ Now! 2012] Reminder: Call for Submissions, deadline is January 10th, 2012"
- Previous message: sumanth krishna: "[Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- In reply to: sumanth krishna: "[Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- Next in thread: sumanth krishna: "Re: [Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
- Reply: sumanth krishna: "Re: [Boost-users] boost:shared_ptr destructor, SIGBUS, MIPS 64"
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net