Re: [Boost-users] adjacency lists

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] adjacency lists
From: Jeremiah Willcock (jewillco_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-01-19 11:36:12

On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Neiderer, Andrew M CIV (US) wrote:

> 
> This is about 1/4 of error message.  I think if this is addressed then rest of errors will go away.
> 
>  
> 
> Result of
> 
> $g++ -I home/neiderer/src/C++/boost_1_48_0 -c adjacency_list_io.cpp
> 
>  
> 
> (I do think you need src since already exists in .../libs/graph/example)

Please try your code again with the change I just committed to the Boost 
trunk (r76588).

-- Jeremiah Willcock

> 
>  
> 
> Thank you
> 
> ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> From: boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden] [boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] on behalf of Jeremiah Willcock
> [jewillco_at_[hidden]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2012 9:27 AM
> To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
> Subject: Re: [Boost-users] adjacency lists
> 
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2012, Neiderer, Andrew M CIV (US) wrote:
> 
> >
> > I am still learning graphs, BGL 1.48.0 so beginner questions:
> >
> >  
> >
> > 1. not sure what adjacency list/matrix are used  for other than building a graph
> >
> >     for traversal.  Or maybe this is it?
> 
> That is what they are used for -- to build and represent graphs.
> 
> >
> >  
> >
> > 2. I need to build a sparse network.  So I am using adjacency_list_io.cpp by Francois Faure (2001).
> >
> >     In this example I can read(g2), but when outputting
> >
> >  
> >
> >     std::cout << write(g2)
> >
> >  
> >
> >     I get lots of translation errors :-(
> >
> >  
> >
> >     I know I do not give details here but maybe someone could guess a -D??? to make
> >
> >     adjacency_list_io.hpp happy.
> >
> >     (The read(g2) works fine)
> >
> >  
> >
> >     Or I can certainly provide some of the error message.
> 
> Could you please provide that?  I am not familiar with that code.
> 
> >
> >  
> >
> > Also has Dr. Nick Edmonds completed (or near completion) of "active-message" based release (MPI)?
> 
> We are still working on the paper based on that code.  A release is likely
> to be within the next couple of months, but nothing is certain yet.
> 
> -- Jeremiah Willcock
> 
>