Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Signals2] Signal memory overhead
From: Igor R (boost.lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-20 13:54:57

> Since I don't need most of the features (my signals have one active
> connection most of time, seldomly more), I hacked together a small
> replacement that fits my needs as well. That code measures at 32 bytes
> per signal, 32 bytes per slot and 16 bytes per connection. Of course it
> provides nothing except connect/disconnect and operator().
> Am I using the library incorrectly? Does my measurement method skew results?

Do you mean that it's possible to lower signals memory consumption in
a general use-case as well?

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at