Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Signals2] Signal memory overhead
From: Sean Buckheister (s_buckhe_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-26 17:25:21

Next message: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Crash in boost::thread::sleep(xt) (boost 1.42 on Windows 32 bit)"
Previous message: Joachim Faulhaber: "Re: [Boost-users] Multiple definition error with boost::icl"
In reply to: Sean Buckheister: "[Boost-users] [Signals2] Signal memory overhead"

To illustrate my point, and what my (idea of) a very simple signals impl
can do, I've attached some cleaned up code. The overhead is pretty low
already, and some concurrency and combinator functionality as in
Signals2 could be implemented without too high a cost.

Also, if one were to supply a wrapper for object methods that is not
boost::bind nested in boost::function, even more could be saved.

text/x-c++src attachment: signals.cpp

Next message: Ovanes Markarian: "Re: [Boost-users] Crash in boost::thread::sleep(xt) (boost 1.42 on Windows 32 bit)"
Previous message: Joachim Faulhaber: "Re: [Boost-users] Multiple definition error with boost::icl"
In reply to: Sean Buckheister: "[Boost-users] [Signals2] Signal memory overhead"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net