Re: [Boost-users] boost 1.46.1 vs. boost 1.49.0 ?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost 1.46.1 vs. boost 1.49.0 ?
From: JIA Pei (jp4work_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-03-28 19:41:25

It looks like there is something to do with the compiler?
Whenever I tried to use gcc, I will get the errors like

íÎ󣺴ÓÀàÐÍ¡®bool (*)(const string&) {aka bool (*)(const
std::basic_string<char>&)}¡¯µ½ÀàÐÍ¡®boost::enable_if_c<true, void>::type*
{aka void*}¡¯µÄת»»ÎÞЧ [-fpermissive]
C:/boost/boost/filesystem/v3/path.hpp:131:5: ´íÎó£º
 ³õʼ»¯¡®boost::filesystem3::path::path(const Source&, typename
boost::enable_if<boost::filesystem3::path_traits::is_pathable<typename
boost::decay<Source>::type> >::type*) [with Source =
std::basic_string<char>, typename
boost::enable_if<boost::filesystem3::path_traits::is_pathable<typename
boost::decay<Source>::type> >::type = void]¡¯µÄʵ²Î 2 [-fpermissive]

If I'm using Visual Studio 2010, there is no error report. I just finished
testing my code using boost 1.49.0 under Windows7.
I was testing my code with CodeLite with GCC compiler, and Visual Studio
2010.

How come this type of error report?

Cheers
Pei

On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:04 PM, JIA Pei <jp4work_at_[hidden]> wrote:

>
> Hi, all:
>
> My code is as simple as:
>
>> path tempp(dir_path, native );
>
>
> It used to work for boost 1.42. And now, it's working fine with boost
> 1.49.0 ...
> However, current Ubuntu 11.10 affords boost 1.46.1.
> Whenever I tried to compile my code with boost 1.46.1, I got the following
> errors:
>
> invalid conversion from ‘bool (*)(const string&) {aka bool (*)(const
>> std::basic_string<char>&)}’ to ‘boost::enable_if_c<true, void>::type* {aka
>> void*}’ [-fpermissive]
>
>
>
> In addition, I notice there are some other errors at the same time, which
> seems to have something to do with filesystem3 ?
>
>
> Invalid arguments '
>> Candidates are:
>> bool is_directory(boost::filesystem3::file_status)
>> bool is_directory(const boost::filesystem3::path &)
>> bool is_directory(const boost::filesystem3::path &,
>> boost::system::error_code &)
>> '
>
>
>
>
> However, why my code is able to compile with boost 1.49.0 then?
>
>
> Cheers
> Pei
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Pei JIA
>
> Email: jp4work_at_[hidden]
> cell:    [phone]
>
> Welcome to Vision Open
> http://www.visionopen.com
>

-- 
Pei JIA
Email: jp4work_at_[hidden]
cell:    [phone]
Welcome to Vision Open
http://www.visionopen.com