|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [type_traits] defining my own trait
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-07-20 16:00:09
AMDG
On 07/20/2012 10:52 AM, Brian Budge wrote:
>
> I guess the real question is this: is there a way to define
> is_memcpyable so that the value is true if a class does not define
> operator=, and all of it's members or inherited types are also
> memcpyable?
>
No there isn't. This requires compiler support.
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net