Re: [Boost-users] Further Boost.MPI development

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Further Boost.MPI development
From: Matthieu Brucher (matthieu.brucher_at_[hidden])
Date: 2012-10-31 15:54:02

Hi,

My priority would be the vector types with striding... The current way of
doing this is complicated in my opinion. I would like an API close to C,
but with all the C++ RAII stuff. For efficiency/HPC code, it is mandatory.

Cheers and thanks for this (I would like to see Boost.MPI being the only
C++ API :) ).

Matthieu

2012/10/31 Daniel Mitchell <dlm.bulk.messages_at_[hidden]>

> Nonblocking collectives are at the top of my list.
>
> It would also be nice if the environment class could initialize thread
> support.
>
> On Oct 28, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Matthias Troyer <troyer_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> > Dear Boost.MPI users,
> >
> > With the MPI-3 standard having been finalized we want to intensify
> Boost.MPI development as soon as my crazy teaching schedule this fall gives
> me time from the middle of next month. With the deprecation of the - little
> used - official MPI C++ API in MPI-3 Boost.MPI has a chance of becoming a
> de facto standard C++ API for MPI.
> >
> > We first want to focus on features from MPI-2 and MPI-3 that are widely
> used or useful. For this purpose I would like to collect suggestions. Can
> you please reply and mention the functions of MPI that you would most like
> to see supported by Boost.MPI.
> >
> > Best regards
> >
> > Matthias
> > _______________________________________________
> > Boost-users mailing list
> > Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> > http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>

-- 
Information System Engineer, Ph.D.
Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher
Music band: http://liliejay.com/