Re: [Boost-users] intrusive_ptr vs shared-ptr

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] intrusive_ptr vs shared-ptr
From: Nat Linden (nat_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-01-24 11:58:03

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 5:59 AM, John M. Dlugosz <mpbecey7gu_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Now I have noticed that the implementations for shared_from_this interact
> with internals of weak_ptr. But a portable implementation doesn't have to.
> If I had time to write for magazines (and such magazines still existed) I'd
> write that up for an issue.

Hmm, any chance you might just post your implementation to the Boost
Vault in hopes that others might pick up the ball and run with it?