Re: [Boost-users] [Atomic] [Tread] Proposal for Synchronized<T>

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Atomic] [Tread] Proposal for Synchronized<T>
From: Gabriel Bizzotto (gbizzotto_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-19 21:08:45

Hi,


> I've been working already on a synchronized_value class that is in trunk 
[1]. I plan to merge it to release branch as soon as I have finished the 
tests and the documentation. You can see some examples in [2] and [3].

> I've take a look to your class and I think my class provides everything 
yours provide.

Surely your version has been given more thought.

> My class allows in addition to lock several synchronized values using 
the deadlock free lock algorithm as e.g.

I did not understand the unique_synchronize part, though.

> Please could you compare your class to mine and let me know what do you 
think?


I can't see any flaw right now, but I'm still playing with it.
If anything shows up I'll let you know.

Thanks !