Re: [Boost-users] [Atomic] [Tread] Proposal for, Synchronized<T>

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Atomic] [Tread] Proposal for, Synchronized<T>
From: Vicente J. Botet Escriba (vicente.botet_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-02-20 12:41:40

Le 20/02/13 12:49, Gabriel Bizzotto a écrit :
>
> > I have one that does reader/writer locking. I'll pass it along for 
> comparison along with
> design notes (it was done partially for teaching), if it's OK to send 
> a zip file to you.
>
> > ?John
>
> Sure, let's take a look !
>
> You also want to carbon-copy to vicente.botet_at_[hidden] 
> <mailto:vicente.botet_at_[hidden]>, which is putting the finishing 
> touch on the future boost::synchronized_value.
>
>
Yes, once boost::synchronized_value will be enough stable we could think 
on a specialization of  boost::synchronized_value when the Lockable 
template parameter is a shared_mutex/upgrade_mutex. I've added to my 
todo list.

Best,
Vicente