Re: [Boost-users] header-only libraries

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] header-only libraries
From: Emil Dotchevski (emildotchevski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-03-26 13:46:35

On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Igor R <boost.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> I'd like to use the program_options library, but am reluctant to
>> require my users to build parts of Boost.  Is there a strong reason that this library cannot be header-only?

You can build the necessary Boost CPP files as part of your own build.

Emil Dotchevski
Reverge Studios, Inc.
http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode