|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [chrono] Initializing system_clock from microseconds
From: Kelly, Dan (Dan.Kelly_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-06-12 07:24:31
Vincente,
If I'm reading this correctly, what you are proposing is the same as what I did, except that I used an implicit duration_cast<>. Yours is certainly more concise and readable.
This method did work by the way.
Dan
From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Vicente J. Botet Escriba
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 1:44
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [chrono] Initializing system_clock from microseconds
Le 11/06/13 19:15, Kelly, Dan a écrit :
I'm using 1.47, so I would expect this issue to apply. However, I don't think this is what I am experiencing.
Right now I am testing out a fix which initially appears to work but I have to fully verify it.
void my_class::calculate_packet_statistics ( const struct pcap_pkthdr *header ) {
frame_interval_.intervalTimeStamp_ = system_clock::from_time_t( static_cast<time_t>( header->ts.tv_sec ) );
// Cast to a duration using the system_clock's tick period.
system_clock::duration us_duration = duration_cast< system_clock::duration >( microseconds( header->ts.tv_usec ) );
frame_interval_.intervalTimeStamp_ += us_duration;
...
}
I would have thought my previous implementation would have done this cast implicitly, but that doesn't appear to be the case. I'll let you know if this works.
What about something like
frame_interval_.intervalTimeStamp_ =
system_clock::from_time_t( static_cast<time_t>( header->ts.tv_sec ) ) +
nanoseconds( header->ts.tv_usec);
Best,
Vicente
________________________________
IMPORTANT: The information contained in this email and/or its attachments is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by reply and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. Any review, use, reproduction, disclosure or dissemination of this message or any attachment by an unintended recipient is strictly prohibited. Neither this message nor any attachment is intended as or should be construed as an offer, solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell any security or other financial instrument. Neither the sender, his or her employer nor any of their respective affiliates makes any warranties as to the completeness or accuracy of any of the information contained herein or that this message or any of its attachments is free of viruses.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net