|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] graph theoretical problem
From: Peter Foelsche (foelsche_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-05 13:20:02
On Mon, 5 Aug 2013, Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
thanks!
> How important is a good solution compared to doing the scheduling
> quickly? One option you may have is work stealing, which is designed
there will be many executions of the optimized graph -- of course the optimization must complete in a reasonable time
> for dynamic tasks being spread across threads; one implementation that
> allows dependencies is PFunc (https://projects.coin-or.org/PFunc). An
> optimal solution will be hard to find, since the problem (with arbirary
> dependencies) is NP-complete even for scheduling onto one thread. Do
> you have further restrictions on the dependencies (at most one
> predecessor, at most one successor, etc.)?
no -- there might be zero or more (including more than one) predecessors or successors for every task
Peter
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net