Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?
From: Juraj Ivanèiæ (juraj.ivancic_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-08-23 13:26:54

Next message: Michel Morin: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::any_range with an abstract class reference"
Previous message: Neal Becker: "[Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
In reply to: Neal Becker: "[Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
Next in thread: Steve Lorimer: "Re: [Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
Reply: Steve Lorimer: "Re: [Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"

On 23.8.2013. 14:01, Neal Becker wrote:
> If I already built against python2.7, do I need to build again against python 3?
> This is on Fedora 19 linux.
>
Yes. IIRC, the resulting library will be named (boost_)python3.

Next message: Michel Morin: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::any_range with an abstract class reference"
Previous message: Neal Becker: "[Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
In reply to: Neal Becker: "[Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
Next in thread: Steve Lorimer: "Re: [Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"
Reply: Steve Lorimer: "Re: [Boost-users] Do I need a seperate boost_python lib for python 3?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net