Re: [Boost-users] Safe to pass dereferenced anonymous shared_ptr?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Safe to pass dereferenced anonymous shared_ptr?
From: Krzysztof Czainski (1czajnik_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-06 05:50:12

2013/11/6 Krzysztof Czainski <1czajnik_at_[hidden]>

> If you're not in C++11, then consider returning by value anyway. RVO will
> most likely avoid the copy anyway. That said, (I wish unique_ptr emulation
> was in boost) I get it why use shared_ptr even though you don't share
> anything...
>

Or maybe return a boost::container::vector<char> in C++98? It's movable,
you know ;-)

HTH,
Kris