Re: [Boost-users] Problem with variadic BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM in Clang

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Problem with variadic BOOST_PP_TUPLE_REM in Clang
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2013-11-14 08:26:31

On 11/14/2013 1:16 AM, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:41 PM, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:eldiener_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
>
>     When Paul created the code for automatically determining if a
>     compiler has variadic macro support he did not include clang as
>     among the compilers for which BOOST_PP_VARIADICS is 1 ( variadic
>     support is on ). Please try specifically turning on variadic macro
>     support for clang by defining BOOST_PP_VARIADICS=1 when you use the
>     clang compiler.
>
>
> Shouldn't this branching be inverted now that variadic macros are
> standard? In other words, shouldn't it rely on
> BOOST_NO_CXX11_VARIADIC_MACROS?

Currently Boost PP does not depend on any other Boost library, not even 
Config.

I imagine that Paul might respond to this issue. If he does not I will 
notify him of it.