Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Mock ?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost.Mock ?
From: Daniel Krikun (dkrikun0_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-01-20 11:04:39

I didn't check if google.mock could be used separately from google.test.
In fact, I am very comfortable with using both of them together.
On Jan 20, 2014 6:42 AM, "Richard" <legalize+jeeves_at_[hidden]>
wrote:

> [Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
>
> boost-users_at_[hidden] spake the secret code
> <CAGQZnhyEmdKp8vFLdrUQJHCeL4e0mzftvgRsXn06XnBZ1wA0TA_at_[hidden]>
> thusly:
>
> >It could be of interest, but there is already google-mock out there, and
> it
> >is a good tool, I see no reason why to have another mock library.
>
> While older versions of google mock could be used independent of
> google test, it seems that the current versions of google mock have a
> link dependency on google test.  I don't want to link in google test
> just to use google mock.
>
> Have you tried using current versions of google mock without using
> google test?
> --
> "The Direct3D Graphics Pipeline" free book <
> http://tinyurl.com/d3d-pipeline>
>      The Computer Graphics Museum <http://computergraphicsmuseum.org>
>          The Terminals Wiki <http://terminals.classiccmp.org>
>   Legalize Adulthood! (my blog) <http://legalizeadulthood.wordpress.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>