Re: [Boost-users] Boost or Standard when there is the choice?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost or Standard when there is the choice?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-02-16 08:04:45

On 15 February 2014 21:11, gast128 <gast128_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> my experience with Visual Studio where the Dinkumware implementation
>> almost always outperforms or is similar to a Boost implementation
>
> I had one big bad experience with std::unordered_map in the past, see topic
> 'Performance difference between std::unordered_map and boost::unordered_map'
> (https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.lang.c++.moderated/pFBjDiW6mW0).

According to Joaquin's recent benchmarks the recent standard
implementations are generally faster than the boost implementation,
which IMO is how it should be. I'm looking forward to
Boost.Unordered's obsolescence.

http://bannalia.blogspot.co.uk/