Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [typeindex v3.0] Peer review begins Mon 21st ends Wed 30th
From: Antony Polukhin (antoshkka_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-04-24 01:23:03

2014-04-23 17:33 GMT+04:00 Paul A. Bristow <pbristow_at_[hidden]>:

> > 2. What is your evaluation of the implementation?
> OK.
> Though I'm not enthusiastic about the name of namespace boost::typeind::
> but I
> don't have any much better ideas. Perhaps someone else has?
> Nor am I clear that this namespace bti helps the reader.
> "Through all the examples, we'll assume that the following namespace alias
> is in
> effect:
> namespace bti = boost::typeind;
> "
> IMO, the frequency of use of the namespace bti is probably so low that
> spelling
> it out is clearer, for example:
> boost::typeind::type_id<T>().pretty_name() // human readable

Agreed: boost::typeindex would be more user friendly. It suggests to the
reader which library to look for.
Other notes will be also addressed.

Thanks for the review!

Best regards,
Antony Polukhin

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at