Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Signals2 benchmark
From: Tim Janus (timjanus_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-06 04:21:59
Am 06.02.2015 um 08:49 schrieb Dominique Devienne:
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 12:15 AM, Joren Heit <jorenheit_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:jorenheit_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
> I have been working on [...] a template-based Signal/Slot library
> [...],I want to test it against boost::signals2 to get an idea of
> how well it performs.
> [...]. Initial tests show that my own library can be up to 10
> times faster than the boost-implementation, [...]
> This benchmark  might be of interest. --DD
> PS: In particular, note how the one asterisk'd with "Library aims to
> be thread safe" are at the bottom.
But comparing thread-safe implementations with implementations that are
not thread-safe seems a bit unfair to me.
A benchmark that uses the dummy_mutex policy  of signals2 would be
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net