Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Signals2 benchmark
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-09 20:00:05
On 8 Feb 2015 at 19:25, Nevin Liber wrote:
> > > Is it reallistic that folks would want a variant of signals that's not
> > > threadsafe, trading some callback restrictions for performance?
> > I think a version which is compile time switchable is the ideal.
> Unless you can always build everything from source (as opposed to linking
> against libraries built by others), this becomes a nightmare when trying to
> avoid ODR violations.
It would be a very poor implementation that had that problem Nevin.
You'd almost certainly use namespaces or template parameters to make
symbol unique the two implementations.
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net