Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [program options] an alternative for "add_options()" avail?
From: Michael Powell (mwpowellhtx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-14 23:42:18
On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:01 PM, U.Mutlu <for-gmane_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> I'm newbie to 'program options'.
> I just wanted to ask if there is an alternative for the below example from
> the online-doc:
> ("help", "produce help message")
> ("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level")
What's wrong with this form? When I worked with it, it took a little
getting used to, but once you got past the syntax, it works just fine.
> I would like to have something more traditional like the following single
> element addition alternative:
> desc.add_option("help", "produce help message");
> desc.add_option("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level");
> Is something like this already in the library?
> Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net