Re: [Boost-users] [program options] an alternative for "add_options()" avail?

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [program options] an alternative for "add_options()" avail?
From: Michael Powell (mwpowellhtx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-14 23:42:18

On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 10:01 PM, U.Mutlu <for-gmane_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm newbie to 'program options'.
> I just wanted to ask if there is an alternative for the below example from
> the online-doc:
>  desc.add_options()
>    ("help", "produce help message")
>    ("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level")
>  ;

What's wrong with this form? When I worked with it, it took a little
getting used to, but once you got past the syntax, it works just fine.

> I would like to have something more traditional like the following single
> element addition alternative:
>  desc.add_option("help", "produce help message");
>  desc.add_option("compression", po::value<int>(), "set compression level");
>
> Is something like this already in the library?

Don't know.

> --
> TIA
> Uenal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users