Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [variant] Possible regression from 1.55 to 1.58
From: Mario Lang (mlang_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-08-11 18:54:29

Tim Song <t.canens.cpp_at_[hidden]> writes:

> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Mario Lang <mlang_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> The example is a bit silly, since foreach discards the return value of
>> apply_visitor anyway. So my solution was to change the visitor to
>> define result_type as void. This works. However, I am wondering why
>> delayed_visitor does no longer work in this situation? Is it because I
>> am trying to return a reference?
> I believe this is caused by a bug in the trait used to detect whether
> result_type is present. It used to form a pointer to result_type,
> and pointer to references are ill-formed, so the trait reports that
> result_type doesn't exist, and then the overloads of apply_visitor
> do not SFINAE correctly.

Sounds about right, thanks for the hint!

> The bug has been fixed in

So I guess this would be fixed with 1.59 then?


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at, kalb at, bjorn.karlsson at, gregod at, wekempf at