Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess mapped_file binary compatibility
From: Vladimir Kotlyar (vk38_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-09-16 13:50:23

Next message: Robert Ramey: "[Boost-users] problem with boost units"
Previous message: Mikhail Strelnikov: "[Boost-users] Problems with boost::coroutines with lambda captures"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess mapped_file binary compatibility"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess mapped_file binary compatibility"

What, if anything, can be assumed about cross-platform and backwards binary
compatibility of files generated using boost::ipc classes? I could not find
any explicit statement in the IPC library docs.
Thanks.

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-interprocess-mapped-file-binary-compatibility-tp4680130.html
Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Robert Ramey: "[Boost-users] problem with boost units"
Previous message: Mikhail Strelnikov: "[Boost-users] Problems with boost::coroutines with lambda captures"
Next in thread: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess mapped_file binary compatibility"
Reply: Ion Gaztañaga: "Re: [Boost-users] boost::interprocess mapped_file binary compatibility"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net