Re: [Boost-users] boost variant is not a literal type

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] boost variant is not a literal type
From: Glen Fernandes (glen.fernandes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-01-06 18:09:22

Robert wrote:
> c) Is there any reason that you haven't submitted this to the Boost
> Library Incubator? 

Agustin's reasons in this thread:
http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2015/06/223920.php

Glen

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-variant-is-not-a-literal-type-tp4682534p4682542.html
Sent from the Boost - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.