Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Looping through variadic macro arguments
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-03-30 14:42:41
On 3/30/2016 4:35 AM, Florian Lindner wrote:
> I have integrated the code in our project now and it fails to compile
> with some older clang version.
> It compiles fine with clang++ 3.7.1 and g++ 5.3.0 on my arch machine as
> well as g++ 4.8.4 on our ubuntu server, but fails with clang++ 3.4 on
> this machine as well as the travis
> The complete compiler messages are at http://pastebin.com/HgjgCfsH it
> is mostly something like that:
> error: unknown type name 'BOOST_PP_IIF_0'
> assertion( reinterpret_cast<Vector&>(*this).size()==toAssign.size() );
> The assertions code is at
> as well as all other code files.
> If you want to give it a try, you can clone the project and use
> clang++ -o
> -c -Wall -std=c++11 -fPIC -Wsign-compare -g3 -O0 -DDebug -DAsserts
> -DPRECICE_NO_PETSC -DEIGEN_INITIALIZE_MATRICES_BY_NAN -DPRECICE_NO_MPI
> -DNPY_NO_DEPRECATED_API=NPY_1_7_API_VERSION -Isrc -I/usr/include
> -I/usr/include/python2.7 -I/usr/include/python2.7/numpy
> (it's also included in the pastebin above)
> Do you have any idea?
Would you please post a complete example along with your command line as
a Boost bug report for the preprocessor library ? That way I am more
likely to take a look at it. My guess, without knowing the details of
your example, is just a clang-3.4 bug which has been fixed in a later
release but if your problem is easily reproducable I can add a test to
the preprocessor tests, based on your example, which shows the clang-3.4
bug. Currently my preprocessor tests using clang-3.4 do not show any
problems so incorporating such a test showing a problem will be
worthwhile for me.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net