Re: [Boost-users] Boost Coroutine

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost Coroutine
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2016-10-29 04:32:51

2016-10-28 21:34 GMT+02:00 Emile Cormier <emile.cormier.jr_at_[hidden]>:

> Did the API change from Coroutine1 to Coroutine2? Is it simply a matter of
> including from boost/coroutine2/xxx instead of boost/coroutine/xxx based on
> some preprocessor macro being defined?
>

The API is almost the same - boost.coroutine2 requires some C++11 features
and uses namespace coroutine2.