Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] 1.63.0: diffenre package with the same version
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-01-15 18:32:59


On 15 January 2017 at 22:22, Ivan Kabaivanov <chepati_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first time poster here.
>
> I've been compiling boost from source for about 8 years now. I download the
> packages from sourceforge.net
> (https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/1.63.0/).
>
> Lately (last few releases) I notice a troubling trend -- the same package,
> say boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2 will have a different md5 hash if downloaded again
> a few weeks after being downloaded for the first time.
>
> Case in point:
>
> boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2, downloaded around Fri Dec 30 17:11:50 2016 +0200
> (GMT+2) had md5 hash d17537e28aa2131fa192ce2870ce72a3.
> The very same file, dowloaded today (January 15, 2017) has a new md5 hash:
> 1c837ecd990bb022d07e7aab32b09847.

Checking the copy of that file on the web server:

$ ls -l boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--. 1 dnljms guests 81984414 Dec 26 18:35 boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2
$ md5sum boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2
1c837ecd990bb022d07e7aab32b09847 boost_1_63_0.tar.bz2

So your new download has the same md5 hash as a download from the time
of release.

I wonder if this is related to the email linked below? The dates match.

http://lists.boost.org/Archives/boost/2016/12/232220.php

Another possibility is that your old download is a snapshot. They have
the same file names as releases, which is a bit confusing:

https://sourceforge.net/projects/boost/files/boost/snapshots/master/

The diff you posted suggests it was a different documentation build
(the changes are ids which are different for every build), rather than
sourceforge modifying the file.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net