Re: [Boost-users] Ranges

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Ranges
From: Steve Lorimer (steve.lorimer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-07-29 18:45:16

The Ranges library being considered for standardisation is Eric Neibler's.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2016/n4569.pdf

At the summer C++ standards meeting in Toronto Ranges TS completed its
review ballot, so it is almost certain to be in C++20

Further details on the "Ranges TS “Ready” Issues for the July 2017
(Toronto) meeting" here:
http://open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/papers/2017/p0663r0.html

On 29 July 2017 at 09:39, Robert Jones via Boost-users <
boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> I realise this isn't strictly about Boost, but I'd appreciate if someone
> could say a few words about the current state of ranges in the standard,
> Boost or elsewhere.
>
> I'm familiar with the current Boost.Range, but thought there was a newer
> and rather different range library from Eric Neibler which was Boost
> compatible but not formally part of Boost, is that right?
>
> Are either of these part of the C++ standard, either now or planned, or is
> there anything else planned for the standard?
>
> Thx.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Rob.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
>