|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [boost] [release] Boost 1.66.0 Beta 1
From: Michael Powell (mwpowellhtx_at_[hidden])
Date: 2017-11-24 23:02:53
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 5:55 PM, Tom Kent via Boost-users
<boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Michael Powell via Boost-users
> <boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 5:43 PM, Tom Kent via Boost-users
>> <boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:41 AM, Daniel James via Boost
>> > <boost_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Boost release 1.66.0 beta 1 is now available at:
>> >>
>> >> <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.66.0.beta.1/source/>
>> >>
>> >> The SHA256 checksums are as follows:
>> >>
>> >> e7b23e638e8c3a9da1512439385b04850829cea7bd56d8398677c096857d830b
>> >> boost_1_66_0_b1.7z
>> >> 5d0405eb73bd609ebcd54bbc96d4f1e2d97c51b96c4703706695ddd94f942d6b
>> >> boost_1_66_0_b1.tar.bz2
>> >> f0f455e39bc47b2b670a17cb221687506e9a22dc478956d3d8aabb9cb835a7dc
>> >> boost_1_66_0_b1.tar.gz
>> >> 694c8b9e902b7981670bce166f675f3875c19326936db51aabd98d2ddfea9b45
>> >> boost_1_66_0_b1.zip
>> >>
>> >> For details of what's in the release, see
>> >> <http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_66_0.html>.
>> >>
>> >> Please download the beta, give it a try, and report any problems you
>> >> encounter.
I haven't noticed anything yet, but I was just curious. Wanting to
gain a better understanding.
Mainly I am concerned with VS2015+. I'm not so concerned with VS2012-;
arguably VS2013 is less relevant today than it ever was.
I did look at the DV file, but it didn't name anything like a specific
runtime, platform SDK, etc.
>> >> Thanks,
>> >>
>> >> -- The Boost Release Team
>> >
>> >
>> > The corresponding windows builds have been created and are available on
>> > bintray at:
>> > http://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.66.0.beta.1/binaries/
>>
>> Which SDK(s) are you building against? C/C++ run-times?
>>
>> That I know of, I've got Windows 8.x and 10 platform SDKs installed.
>
>
> I'm not entirely sure which SDKs get built into things by default. The
> builds are performed on Server 2012R2, but I don't think that affects the
> outputs. For older versions of Visual Studio it was just the C runtime. Has
> that changed with 2015/2017?
>
> The DEPENDENCY_VERSIONS.txt file with the release indicates most of the
> various versions I've seen important dependencies stem from. I'd be happy to
> identify more to add to there if they are truly relevant.
>
> Tom
>
> _______________________________________________
> Boost-users mailing list
> Boost-users_at_[hidden]
> https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net