Re: [Boost-users] [Variant] Minimum implementation to be variant friendly

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [Variant] Minimum implementation to be variant friendly
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-13 00:23:48

On 11/12/2018 7:12 PM, Michael Powell via Boost-users wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> What's the minimum implementation a struct needs to fulfill in order
> to be boost::variant friendly? Things like, does it need to support
> perfect forwarding? An assignment operator? And so on.

What do you mean by "boost::variant friendly" ?

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Michael Powell
>