Boost logo

Boost Users :

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] [release] Boost 1.69.0 Beta 1 Release Candidate 1
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2018-11-14 18:06:02


On 11/14/2018 12:39 PM, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 9:02 AM Edward Diener via Boost-users
> <boost-users_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>> wrote:
>
> On 11/14/2018 11:06 AM, Marshall Clow via Boost-users wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:30 PM Tom Kent via Boost-users
> > <boost-users_at_[hidden] <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>>> wrote:
> >
> >
> >     On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 9:36 AM Marshall Clow via Boost-users
> >     <boost-users_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>
> <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]
> <mailto:boost-users_at_[hidden]>>>
> >     wrote:
> >
> >         The release candidates for the first 1.69.0 beta release
> are now
> >         available at:
> >
> >
>  <https://dl.bintray.com/boostorg/beta/1.69.0.beta.1.rc1/source/>
> >
> >         As always, the release managers would appreciate it if
> you download
> >         the candidate of your choice and give building it a try.
> Please
> >         report
> >         both success and failure, and anything else that is
> noteworthy.
> >
> >
> >     toolset     arch    compile Link    Execute
> >     msvc-8.0    32      FAIL    X       X
> >     msvc-8.0    64      FAIL    X       X
> >     msvc-9.0    32      X       X       X
> >     msvc-9.0    64      X       X       X
> >     msvc-10.0   32      X       X       X
> >     msvc-10.0   64      X       X       X
> >     msvc-11.0   32      X       X       X
> >     msvc-11.0   64      X       X       X
> >     msvc-12.0   32      X       X       X
> >     msvc-12.0   64      X       X       X
> >     msvc-14.0   32      FAIL    X       X
> >     msvc-14.0   64      FAIL    X       X
> >     msvc-14.1   32      X       X       X
> >     msvc-14.1   64      X       X       X
> >
> >     Compile means that the b2 command completed without errors
> >     Link means that visual studio was able to link a sample
> executable
> >     to a library (libboost_thread-vcXXX-mt[-gd]-1_XX.lib)
> >     generated
> >     Execute means that the linked program executed without errors.
> >
> >     Full build logs can be found here:
> > https://gist.github.com/teeks99/526cf2598d1697557e45e590ce9517be
> >
> >     Lots of errors with msvc-8.0:
> >
> >     compile-c-c++
> >
>  bin.v2\libs\log\build\msvc-8.0\release\link-static\threadapi-win32\threading-multi\trivial.obj
> >     trivial.cpp
> >     .\boost/parameter/aux_/arg_list.hpp(227) : error C2064: term does
> >     not evaluate to a function taking 1 arguments
> >              .\boost/parameter/aux_/arg_list.hpp(390) : see
> reference to
> >     class template instantiation
> >     'boost::parameter::aux::arg_list<TaggedArg,Next>' being compiled
> >
> >       If there is an easy way to fix arg_list.hpp that would be nice,
> >     but if this is the time to stop build 8.0, that's fine too.
>
> I have essentially backed out a fix on 'develop' for VC++8.0 which
> intended to fix another problem with a multiple definitions linking
> error, https://github.com/boostorg/mpl/pull/36.
>
> I would like to push this change to 'master'. It should fix your
> problem
> above with VC++8.0. I will subsequently take another look at the
> original fix and see if it can not be corrected.
>
>
> If you're confident that this will fix the problem, then please do so.

I have updated 'master' with the backed out change. This should fix the
problems you are seeing for the release candidate with vc++8.0. I will
take another look at the original fix and if I am sure I can fix the
original fix correctly, which is trivial codewise, I will do so for 1.69
if it is wished.


Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net