|
Boost Users : |
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] I ran b2 with the -d+2 command and redirected the output to a file
From: Paul A. Bristow (pbristow_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-01-04 15:49:52
From: Boost-users [mailto:boost-users-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Osman Zakir via Boost-users
Sent: 03 January 2019 22:27
To: boost-users_at_[hidden]
Cc: Osman Zakir
Subject: [Boost-users] I ran b2 with the -d+2 command and redirected the output to a file
This is a follow-up to the message where I asked for help about a failed attempt to build Boost. I ran b2 with the -d+2 command in
addition to the other commands and also redirected the output to a file. It's attached to this message, as well as the
project-config.jam file.
Well this looks quite encouraging - in that most of the key libraries are built OK. Well done for exploring off the end of the
known universe!
You can see a complete list of successes by looking your /lib/ folder.
A few more Wno- items would reduce clutter in the log file.
You may probably find that you can use what you have to get some or all of your applications going (partly because so much of Boost
is header only). Worth a try to size the scale of remaining problems?
So congratulations for making a big step forward (despite the size of the log file ;-)
If you decide that you dont need the failing libraries, you can get a clean build by adding-- without_some_library for example
--without-python ...
>b2 -a will try to build everything from scratch.
(If you want a completely clean re-build, you can, are from time to time should, delete the whole of the folder bin.v2 before
running b2 with all your options - most conveniently in a .bat file).
Sadly I have no idea on individual failures, but I fear you will have to raise a query with each failing library maintainer (on this
list) to find what is missing to build the failing libraries.
For example:
You are not alone is finding that __imp_CryptEnumProvidersA is missing
http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-1-19-0-fails-to-build-random-using-clang-cl-tp4706741.html
I think that this should be provided by Microsoft Strong Cryptographic Provider
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/desktop/seccrypto/microsoft-enhanced-cryptographic-provider
is wincrypt.h inaccessible? Or is there a .dll that you need to link?
Sadly Microsoft seem not to provide an index of all these __imp_ items. I've had to guess :-(
Keep going!
Paul
PS 7-zip.org provides the most popular and convenient zipper.
--- Paul A. Bristow Prizet Farmhouse Kendal UK LA8 8AB +44 (0) 1539 561830
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net