Re: [Boost-users] generalize boost macros

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] generalize boost macros
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-01 21:08:35

multiprecision/float128_t:
>   there are still many features missing
Specifically?
>   most values ​​in numeric_limits<float128_t> are not constexpr

I know :(

There has been some work towards making the library constexpr throughout 
where possible: but I came to the conclusion that it wasn't possible 
without is_constant_evaluated() from C++20. numeric_limits<float128> 
might be possible though.

>
> math::constants:
>   i miss log2(2/e/pi/10) etc

Not sure I follow, do you really mean log2(2) ??

Best, John.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus