Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] generalize boost macros
From: John Maddock (jz.maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-01 21:08:35
> there are still many features missing
> most values ââin numeric_limits<float128_t> are not constexpr
I know :(
There has been some work towards making the library constexpr throughout
where possible: but I came to the conclusion that it wasn't possible
without is_constant_evaluated() from C++20. numeric_limits<float128>
might be possible though.
> i miss log2(2/e/pi/10) etc
Not sure I follow, do you really mean log2(2) ??
--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net