Re: [Boost-users] Ambiguous symbols possibly caused by Boost 1.69.0

Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Ambiguous symbols possibly caused by Boost 1.69.0
From: degski (degski_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-02-27 16:25:33

On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 18:12, Tim Burgess via Boost-users <
boost-users_at_[hidden]> wrote:

> Next step, don't top-post (there's a link somewhere [on Boost.org] about
> this, but I don't have it)!
>
> TB: It’s here and I take the ppoint:
>
>
>
> https://www.boost.org/community/policy.html#quoting
>

No worries. I'm an avid follower of the cfe-dev
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/> list, because that [Clang] is
what I use on a daily basis. They don't follow this rule [and only
top-post], and it's an absolute horror to read the mailing list. They [the
Clang devs] don't seem to mind. I'm not in any position to tell them to
sanitize their posing habits [because I've got nothing to contribute to
Clang], so I put up with it, but it's a pain in the proverbial behind. I'm
happy Boost does much better.

degski
-- 
*"Big boys don't cry" - **Eric Stewart, Graham Gouldman*