Boost Users :
Subject: Re: [Boost-users] Boost library name formats
From: Steven Watanabe (watanabesj_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-03-15 15:05:39
On 3/14/19 8:57 PM, Damien via Boost-users wrote:
> For several years now we've built Boost libraries on Windows with a
> minimal set of tags in the library and dll names.Â Our dlls and libs
> have looked like this:
> We just upgraded from 1.65.1 to 1.69 and the same bjam command (with a
> new bootstrapped bjam) is now giving us an extra x64 tag:
> Has a default setting in bjam been changed?Â What can we add to the bjam
> command to get back to the old minimal names?
Appending a Boost version will lock the format to
whatever was used at that version. I do not
recommend using this for the long term. It is
undocumented and is intended for transitional use.
Sufficiently old formats may be removed without notice.
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net