Boost Users :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Mateusz Loskot (mateusz_at_[hidden])
Date: 2019-11-23 12:19:07

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: boost::regex (implementation question)"
Previous message: John Emmas: "boost::regex (implementation question)"
In reply to: Krzysztof Jusiak: "Re: [boost] Interest in a C++20 Unit Testing Framework?"
Next in thread: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Interest in a C++20 Unit Testing Framework?"

On Sat, 23 Nov 2019 at 04:31, Krzysztof Jusiak <krzysztof_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>
> Thank you for your feedback. I appreciate it.
>

In my previous post I forgot to add one more point:

IMO, the library like UT should be implemented as a facade for
Catch2, Boost.Test or whatever.
Then, it would offer unique features with real value to users,
other than the modern macro-less syntax sugar.

Best regards,

-- 
Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net

Next message: John Maddock: "Re: boost::regex (implementation question)"
Previous message: John Emmas: "boost::regex (implementation question)"
In reply to: Krzysztof Jusiak: "Re: [boost] Interest in a C++20 Unit Testing Framework?"
Next in thread: Vinnie Falco: "Re: [boost] Interest in a C++20 Unit Testing Framework?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net