|
Boost Users : |
From: Larry Evans (cppljevans_at_[hidden])
Date: 2020-03-06 00:12:33
On 3/5/20 1:54 PM, deb via Boost-users wrote:
> Yes, mp_find and then mp_at_c would equivalently do the job .
> And, if I may ask , do you know of any significant difference(regarding
> compile-time) between the iterator based approach of mpl and mp_find?
> Thanks.
>
>
Deb, the subject of profiling template compile times came up here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-March/064811.html
with the subject line:
Clang: How to Analyse Compiletime of Templates?
Maybe that could give you some hints of doing it yourself.
HTH.
-Larry
Boost-users list run by williamkempf at hotmail.com, kalb at libertysoft.com, bjorn.karlsson at readsoft.com, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, wekempf at cox.net